Re: Bug with jprobes and function graph tracer

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:39:33 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Yeah we should try to fix this, but not so high priority since jprobe
> is not used so frequently. I guess one easy solution is adding notrace
> to all jprobe handlers for hiding it from function-graph tracer.
> If there is a way to check a function is notrace or not, I can use that
> in register_jprobe and reject it if the handler is not "notrace"ed. :)

Adding notrace should be the last resort. Every notrace in the kernel
makes function tracing a little more useless. It bothers me even more
when notrace is added because of function graph tracing but the
function still works for function tracing.

I worked on this for the last few days and have a patch that fixes the
problem. I'll be posting it later today. It also uncovered another
unrelated bug that I worked on yesterday, otherwise I would have posted
these fixes already.

I have a fix for the other bug now but it needs to be cleaned up
(remove all the debugging prints from it). When that's complete I'll
post the patches and get them ready for mainline and stable.

Thanks,

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/