Re: [RFC PATCH] irqchip: add dumb demultiplexer implementation
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Tue Jan 13 2015 - 07:41:51 EST
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hmm, my question was not really clear: I was talking about irq flags [1]
> (those that are set with irq_modify_status in the generic irq chip [2]).
Ah, ok. Taking the same approach should be ok.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/