Re: [patch 1/3] mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test

[Michal Hocko]

On Fri 09-01-15 21:13:59, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> kzalloc_node() automatically falls back to nodes with suitable memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index fd9e542fc26f..aad254b30708 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4520,13 +4520,10 @@ static void __init mem_cgroup_soft_limit_tree_init(void)
>  {
>  	struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *rtpn;
>  	struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *rtpz;
> -	int tmp, node, zone;
> +	int node, zone;
>  
>  	for_each_node(node) {
> -		tmp = node;
> -		if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
> -			tmp = -1;
> -		rtpn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rtpn), GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
> +		rtpn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rtpn), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>  		BUG_ON(!rtpn);
>  
>  		soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[node] = rtpn;
> -- 
> 2.2.0
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/