Re: your recent tools/include/ adjustments

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 13.01.15 at 14:29, <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:48:35AM +0000, Jan Beulich escreveu:
>> Arnaldo,
>> 
>> considering that tools/include/ gets used by other than just perf, in
>> particular arch/x86/vdso/vdso2c.c, would you mind clarifying how
>> "tools: Move bitops.h from tools/perf/util to tools/" adding an
>> inclusion of asm/hweight.h to linux/bitops.h is supposed to work,
>> when the only potentially relevant header to be found is
>> tools/perf/util/include/asm/hweight.h?
> 
> Oops, includes are tricky, even more so when trying to reuse the kernel
> ones in tools/, so we need to go on addressing these problems, thanks
> for reporting.
> 
> Please take a look if the patch at the end addresses this problem, I
> think it should at least disentangle what is in tools/include from what
> is in tools/perf/.

It looks like it would fix the issue - thanks for the quick response.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/