Re: [PATCH] headers_check: don't warn about kexec.h

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 13 January 2015 18:13:32 Paul Bolle wrote:
> 
> For the seqbuf_dump() stuff there are apparently users. I forgot the
> details, but the sound people wanted to keep that declaration (and some
> related ancient things) in the header involved to keep some really
> ancient stuff buildable.
> 
> But the kexec_load declaration isn't very useful for userspace, see the
> patch I submitted in
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389791824.17407.9.camel@x220 . And After my
> attempt the export of that declaration has also been discussed in
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/115373b6ac68ee7a305975896e1c4971e8e51d4c.1408731991.git.geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> In that last discussion no one has been able to point to an actual user
> of it. So, as far as I can tell, no one actually uses it. Which makes
> sense, because including this header by itself doesn't give one access
> to a useful definition of kexec_load. So why bother with the
> declaration?
> 
> The last time that Geoff has been trying to get that patch applied
> should be
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b0702fc4186db21820d686e89afd6480560823db.1415837218.git.geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  I'd rather see that go in.
> 

Fine with me as well. As long as we can find someone to take one of 
the patches, I'm happy.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/