Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] audit: fix filename matching in __audit_inode() and __audit_inode_child()

[Richard Guy Briggs]

On 15/01/08, Paul Moore wrote:
> In all likelihood there were some subtle, and perhaps not so subtle,
> bugs with filename matching in audit_inode() and audit_inode_child()
> for some time, however, recent changes to the audit filename code have
> definitely broken the filename matching code.  The breakage could
> result in duplicate filenames in the audit log and other odd audit
> record entries.  This patch fixes the filename matching code and
> restores some sanity to the filename audit records.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  kernel/auditsc.c |   34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> index c967ffc..98edf06 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> @@ -1846,6 +1846,7 @@ void __audit_inode(struct filename *name, const struct dentry *dentry,
>  	/* The struct filename _must_ have a populated ->name */
>  	BUG_ON(!name->name);
>  #endif
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If we have a pointer to an audit_names entry already, then we can
>  	 * just use it directly if the type is correct.
> @@ -1863,7 +1864,17 @@ void __audit_inode(struct filename *name, const struct dentry *dentry,
>  	}
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_reverse(n, &context->names_list, list) {
> -		if (!n->name || strcmp(n->name->name, name->name))
> +		if (inode->i_ino) {
> +			/* valid inode number, use that for the comparison */
> +			if (n->ino != inode->i_ino ||
> +			    n->dev != inode->i_sb->s_dev)
> +				continue;
> +		} else if (n->name) {
> +			/* inode number has not been set, check the name */
> +			if (strcmp(n->name->name, name->name))
> +				continue;
> +		} else
> +			/* no inode and no name (?!) ... this is odd ... */
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/* match the correct record type */
> @@ -1931,11 +1942,16 @@ void __audit_inode_child(const struct inode *parent,
>  
>  	/* look for a parent entry first */
>  	list_for_each_entry(n, &context->names_list, list) {
> -		if (!n->name || n->type != AUDIT_TYPE_PARENT)
> +		if (!n->name ||
> +		    (n->type != AUDIT_TYPE_PARENT &&
> +		     n->type != AUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		if (n->ino == parent->i_ino &&
> -		    !audit_compare_dname_path(dname, n->name->name, n->name_len)) {
> +		if (n->ino == parent->i_ino && n->dev == parent->i_sb->s_dev &&
> +		    !audit_compare_dname_path(dname,
> +					      n->name->name, n->name_len)) {
> +			if (n->type == AUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN)
> +				n->type = AUDIT_TYPE_PARENT;
>  			found_parent = n;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -1944,11 +1960,8 @@ void __audit_inode_child(const struct inode *parent,
>  	/* is there a matching child entry? */
>  	list_for_each_entry(n, &context->names_list, list) {
>  		/* can only match entries that have a name */
> -		if (!n->name || n->type != type)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		/* if we found a parent, make sure this one is a child of it */
> -		if (found_parent && (n->name != found_parent->name))
> +		if (!n->name ||
> +		    (n->type != type && n->type != AUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (!strcmp(dname, n->name->name) ||
> @@ -1956,6 +1969,8 @@ void __audit_inode_child(const struct inode *parent,
>  						found_parent ?
>  						found_parent->name_len :
>  						AUDIT_NAME_FULL)) {
> +			if (n->type == AUDIT_TYPE_UNKNOWN)
> +				n->type = type;
>  			found_child = n;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -1984,6 +1999,7 @@ void __audit_inode_child(const struct inode *parent,
>  			found_child->name_put = false;
>  		}
>  	}
> +
>  	if (inode)
>  		audit_copy_inode(found_child, dentry, inode);
>  	else
> 
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/