Re: [PATCHv5 1/2] gpio: sch: Consolidate similar algorithms

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Thu Jan 15 2015 - 04:49:22 EST


On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Chang Rebecca Swee Fun
<rebecca.swee.fun.chang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Consolidating similar algorithms into common functions to make
> GPIO SCH simpler and manageable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>

I have removed this patch from the tree. It breaks completely
in build and looks strange:

> +static void sch_gpio_reg_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned gpio, unsigned reg,
> + int val)

Takes struct gpio_chip * as argument...

> +static int sch_gpio_direction_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned gpio_num)
> +{
> + struct sch_gpio *sch = to_sch_gpio(gc);
>
> + spin_lock(&sch->lock);
> + sch_gpio_reg_set(sch, gpio_num, GIO, 1);

Passes something else as argument.

> static void sch_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned gpio_num, int val)
> {
> struct sch_gpio *sch = to_sch_gpio(gc);
> - u8 curr_vals;
> - unsigned short offset, bit;
>
> spin_lock(&sch->lock);
> -
> - offset = sch_gpio_offset(sch, gpio_num, GLV);
> - bit = sch_gpio_bit(sch, gpio_num);
> -
> - curr_vals = inb(sch->iobase + offset);
> -
> - if (val)
> - outb(curr_vals | (1 << bit), sch->iobase + offset);
> - else
> - outb((curr_vals & ~(1 << bit)), sch->iobase + offset);
> -
> + sch_gpio_reg_set(gc, gpio_num, GLV, val);

Here it is correct.

> @@ -139,18 +123,9 @@ static int sch_gpio_direction_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned gpio_num,
> int val)
> {
> struct sch_gpio *sch = to_sch_gpio(gc);
> - u8 curr_dirs;
> - unsigned short offset, bit;
>
> spin_lock(&sch->lock);
> -
> - offset = sch_gpio_offset(sch, gpio_num, GIO);
> - bit = sch_gpio_bit(sch, gpio_num);
> -
> - curr_dirs = inb(sch->iobase + offset);
> - if (curr_dirs & (1 << bit))
> - outb(curr_dirs & ~(1 << bit), sch->iobase + offset);
> -
> + sch_gpio_reg_set(sch, gpio_num, GIO, 0);

Wrong again. Etc.

Makes me suspect that this patch is not tested at all, so dropped.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/