Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, fpu: don't abuse ->has_fpu in __kernel_fpu_{begin,end}()

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 01/15, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/15/2015 02:20 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c @@ -81,9 +81,7 @@ void
> > __kernel_fpu_begin(void) this_cpu_write(in_kernel_fpu, true);
> >
> > if (__thread_has_fpu(me)) { -		__thread_clear_has_fpu(me);
>
> I will put that line back in the patch series that defers the
> loading of FPU state until the switch to user space,

I think this needs more discussion.

Firstly, __thread_clear_has_fpu() should go into __kernel_fpu_end(), it
should replace restore_fpu_checking().

But does your series actually need this change? Correctness-wise this is
not needed (afaics). Performance-wise I am not sure, kernel_fpu_begin()
is unlikely event. Plus I am not sure this is a win (in general), but I
can be easily wrong.

> but I
> guess we can go either way for now...

Yes, this should not really conflict with your changes in any case.

Given that you acked 1/3 and 3/3, perhaps you can ack this one as well?

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/