Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] perf tools: Add from argument to dso__find_symbol_by_name()
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Fri Jan 16 2015 - 15:48:00 EST
Em Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:48:20AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> When a dso contains multiple symbols which have same name, current
> dso__find_symbol_by_name() only finds an one of them and there's no way
> to get the all symbols without going through the rbtree.
>
> So add the new 'from' argument to dso__find_symbol_by_name() to remember
> current symbol position and returns next symbol if it provided. For the
> first call the from should be NULL and the returned symbol should be
> used as from to the next call. It will return NULL if there's no symbol
> that has given name anymore.
I had some issues with this patch that made me to split it into multiple
ones and use a slightly different approach, I put those patches in a
tmp.perf/urgent branch at my tree:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/urgent
I tested it with a ret probe for do_fork and it work well, thanks for
fixing this up!
See below for the issues:
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/map.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> tools/perf/util/map.h | 3 +++
> tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/map.c b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> index 62ca9f2607d5..01e2696ca8b5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/map.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> @@ -301,8 +301,9 @@ struct symbol *map__find_symbol(struct map *map, u64 addr,
> return dso__find_symbol(map->dso, map->type, addr);
> }
>
> -struct symbol *map__find_symbol_by_name(struct map *map, const char *name,
> - symbol_filter_t filter)
> +struct symbol *map__find_symbol_by_name_from(struct map *map, const char *name,
> + symbol_filter_t filter,
> + struct symbol *from)
> {
> if (map__load(map, filter) < 0)
> return NULL;
> @@ -310,7 +311,13 @@ struct symbol *map__find_symbol_by_name(struct map *map, const char *name,
> if (!dso__sorted_by_name(map->dso, map->type))
> dso__sort_by_name(map->dso, map->type);
>
> - return dso__find_symbol_by_name(map->dso, map->type, name);
> + return dso__find_symbol_by_name(map->dso, map->type, name, from);
> +}
> +
> +struct symbol *map__find_symbol_by_name(struct map *map, const char *name,
> + symbol_filter_t filter)
> +{
> + return map__find_symbol_by_name_from(map, name, filter, NULL);
> }
>
> struct map *map__clone(struct map *map)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/map.h b/tools/perf/util/map.h
> index 6951a9d42339..69acc58e6f9a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/map.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/map.h
> @@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ struct symbol *map__find_symbol(struct map *map,
> u64 addr, symbol_filter_t filter);
> struct symbol *map__find_symbol_by_name(struct map *map, const char *name,
> symbol_filter_t filter);
> +struct symbol *map__find_symbol_by_name_from(struct map *map, const char *name,
> + symbol_filter_t filter,
> + struct symbol *from);
> void map__fixup_start(struct map *map);
> void map__fixup_end(struct map *map);
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> index c24c5b83156c..e5800497ca61 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> @@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ static struct symbol *symbols__find_by_name(struct rb_root *symbols,
> const char *name)
> {
> struct rb_node *n;
> + struct symbol_name_rb_node *s;
>
> if (symbols == NULL)
> return NULL;
> @@ -403,7 +404,6 @@ static struct symbol *symbols__find_by_name(struct rb_root *symbols,
> n = symbols->rb_node;
>
> while (n) {
> - struct symbol_name_rb_node *s;
> int cmp;
>
> s = rb_entry(n, struct symbol_name_rb_node, rb_node);
> @@ -414,10 +414,24 @@ static struct symbol *symbols__find_by_name(struct rb_root *symbols,
> else if (cmp > 0)
> n = n->rb_right;
> else
> - return &s->sym;
> + break;
> }
>
> - return NULL;
> + if (n == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* return first symbol that has same name (if any) */
> + for (n = rb_prev(n); n; n = rb_prev(n)) {
> + struct symbol_name_rb_node *tmp;
> +
> + tmp = rb_entry(n, struct symbol_name_rb_node, rb_node);
> + if (strcmp(tmp->sym.name, s->sym.name))
> + break;
> +
> + s = tmp;
> + }
> +
> + return &s->sym;
> }
Up to here we have a standalone patch, one that fixes
symbols__find_by_name to return the first entry with the given symbol
name, so I split it as-is and kept your authorship credit.
>
> struct symbol *dso__find_symbol(struct dso *dso,
> @@ -436,10 +450,27 @@ struct symbol *dso__next_symbol(struct symbol *sym)
> return symbols__next(sym);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * When @from is NULL, returns first symbol that matched with @name.
> + * Otherwise, returns next symbol after @from in case some (local) symbols
> + * have same name, or NULL.
> + */
> struct symbol *dso__find_symbol_by_name(struct dso *dso, enum map_type type,
> - const char *name)
> + const char *name, struct symbol *from)
Here I think this method should've been renamed
dso__find_symbol_by_name_from(), to keep the semantic coherent, matching
the map__find_symbol_by_name_from() counterpart.
But then, since when from is !NULL, it is not about finding anything,
instead it is about asking for the next entry in the sorted-by-name
rbtree, so instead I introduced a symbol__next_by_name() that does just
that.
The callers then will see if there is a next entry (sorted by name) and
if that entry has the same name.
I.e. keeping the name "find_symbol_by_name" when there is no "find"
operation being made is confusing.
Then, after introducing it, I further introduced a
map__for_each_symbol_with_name(map, sym_name, sym) that wraps it all up
and provides all the symbols with a given name for the loop block in
front of it.
Also:
> {
> - return symbols__find_by_name(&dso->symbol_names[type], name);
> + struct rb_node *n;
> + struct symbol_name_rb_node *s;
> +
> + if (from == NULL)
> + return symbols__find_by_name(&dso->symbol_names[type], name);
> +
> + s = container_of(from, struct symbol_name_rb_node, sym);
> + n = rb_prev(&s->rb_node);
Why are you going backwards here? Since you above stated that
"Otherwise, returns next symbol after @from".
And since you, in symbols__find_by_name as well go on backwards
(rb_prev), rightly, to find the first entry with a given name?
> + if (n == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + s = rb_entry(n, struct symbol_name_rb_node, rb_node);
> + return strcmp(s->sym.name, name) ? NULL : &s->sym;
> }
>
> void dso__sort_by_name(struct dso *dso, enum map_type type)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> index 9d602e9c6f59..cd4f51d95bd0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ int dso__load_kallsyms(struct dso *dso, const char *filename, struct map *map,
> struct symbol *dso__find_symbol(struct dso *dso, enum map_type type,
> u64 addr);
> struct symbol *dso__find_symbol_by_name(struct dso *dso, enum map_type type,
> - const char *name);
> + const char *name, struct symbol *from);
>
> struct symbol *dso__first_symbol(struct dso *dso, enum map_type type);
> struct symbol *dso__next_symbol(struct symbol *sym);
> --
> 2.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/