Re: [PATCH] perf: perl: force to use stdbool.
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Mon Jan 19 2015 - 06:25:49 EST
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:42:17PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> Add Jiri Olsa jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx to CC list. I think jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx should be the main
> email address he uses.
ack ;-)
jirka
>
> On 2015/1/15 13:55, Wang Nan wrote:
> > When building perf for arm64 I hit a warning (and be treated as an
> > error) like below:
> >
> > aarch64-oe-linux-gcc -o .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.o -c -Wbad-function-cast \
> > ... util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
> >
> > In file included from .../usr/lib64/perl/5.14.3/CORE/perl.h:2464:0,
> > from Context.xs:23:
> > /.../usr/lib64/perl/5.14.3/CORE/handy.h:108:0: error: "bool" redefined [-Werror]
> > # define bool char
> > ^
> > In file included from /.../usr/src/kernel/tools/include/linux/types.h:4:0,
> > from /.../usr/src/kernel/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h:19,
> > from /.../usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
> > from /.../usr/include/signal.h:340,
> > from /.../usr/include/sys/param.h:28,
> > from /.../usr/lib64/perl/5.14.3/CORE/perl.h:678,
> > from Context.xs:23:
> > /.../usr/lib/aarch64-oe-linux/gcc/aarch64-oe-linux/4.9.2/include/stdbool.h:33:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> > #define bool _Bool
> >
> > Looks like the failure is caused by arm64 uapi/asm/sigcontext.h, which
> > includes linux/types.h while other archs not.
> >
> > This patch includes stdbool.h before Context.xs and define HAS_BOOL to
> > prevent perl'e headers define its own 'bool'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/scripts/perl/Perf-Trace-Util/Context.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/scripts/perl/Perf-Trace-Util/Context.c b/tools/perf/scripts/perl/Perf-Trace-Util/Context.c
> > index 790ceba..69c3572 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/scripts/perl/Perf-Trace-Util/Context.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/scripts/perl/Perf-Trace-Util/Context.c
> > @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
> > * ANY CHANGES MADE HERE WILL BE LOST!
> > *
> > */
> > -
> > +#include <stdbool.h>
> > +#define HAS_BOOL 1
I saw this patch before.. but I had no idea ;-)
seems hacky to me? Is there any doc saying 'this is how you handle this with perl' ? ;-)
I couldn't find any.. or more detailed explanation why we should
define HAS_BOOL and not perl headers..
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/