Re: [PATCH 7/8] gpio/mpc8xxx: Convert to platform device interface.

[Ricardo Ribalda Delgado]

Hello Peter

I thought the logic behind the original driver was:

1) Create gpiochip so it can be used by other modules/userland
2) if there is also a irq available for it, create a irqdomain.
otherwise continue.

I can change the code so it does not continue, and exit cleanly if the
irqdomain fails.

You are the original developer of the driver. So: do you think it
makes sense to continue only as a gpiochip? :P

If I need to change it I rather add it as a another patch to the
patchset, so if it causes an issue somewhere it can be found easier
via bisect.


Regards!







On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Peter Korsgaard <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> "Ricardo" == Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>  > This way we do not need to transverse the device tree manually.
>  > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>
>  > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  > Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx>
>  > ---
>  >  drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
>  > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
>  > index d1ff879..57eb794 100644
>  > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
>  > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
>  > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  >  #include <linux/of.h>
>  >  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>  >  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  >  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>  >  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  >  #include <linux/irq.h>
>  > @@ -342,8 +343,9 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc8xxx_gpio_ids[] __initdata = {
>  >      {}
>  >  };
>
>  > -static void __init mpc8xxx_add_controller(struct device_node *np)
>  > +static int mpc8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  >  {
>  > +    struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>  >      struct mpc8xxx_gpio_chip *mpc8xxx_gc;
>  >      struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc;
>  >      struct gpio_chip *gc;
>  > @@ -351,11 +353,9 @@ static void __init mpc8xxx_add_controller(struct device_node *np)
>  >      unsigned hwirq;
>  >      int ret;
>
>  > -    mpc8xxx_gc = kzalloc(sizeof(*mpc8xxx_gc), GFP_KERNEL);
>  > -    if (!mpc8xxx_gc) {
>  > -            ret = -ENOMEM;
>  > -            goto err;
>  > -    }
>  > +    mpc8xxx_gc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mpc8xxx_gc), GFP_KERNEL);
>  > +    if (!mpc8xxx_gc)
>  > +            return -ENOMEM;
>
>  >      spin_lock_init(&mpc8xxx_gc->lock);
>
>  > @@ -375,16 +375,16 @@ static void __init mpc8xxx_add_controller(struct device_node *np)
>
>  >      ret = of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
>  >      if (ret)
>  > -            goto err;
>  > +            return ret;
>
>  >      hwirq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
>  >      if (hwirq == NO_IRQ)
>  > -            goto skip_irq;
>  > +            return 0;
>
> Actually, looking closer - Isn't this leaking mm_gc? It was as well
> before, but it would be good to get it fixed.
>
>
>  >       mpc8xxx_gc-> irq = irq_domain_add_linear(np, MPC8XXX_GPIO_PINS,
>  >                                      &mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_ops, mpc8xxx_gc);
>  >      if (!mpc8xxx_gc->irq)
>  > -            goto skip_irq;
>  > +            return 0;
>
> And here as well?
>
>
> --
> Bye, Peter Korsgaard



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/