Re: [patch] mm: memcontrol: default hierarchy interface for memory fix - high reclaim

[Johannes Weiner]

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:25:19PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 17-01-15 10:21:19, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > High limit reclaim can currently overscan in proportion to how many
> > charges are happening concurrently.  Tone it down such that charges
> > don't target the entire high-boundary excess, but instead only the
> > pages they charged themselves when excess is detected.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I certainly agree with this approach.
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> Is this planned to be folded into the original patch or go on its own. I
> am OK with both ways, maybe having it separate would be better from
> documentation POV.

I submitted them to be folded in.  Which aspect would you like to see
documented?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/