Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, fpu: don't abuse FPU in kernel threads if use_eager_fpu()

[Rik van Riel]

On 01/19/2015 01:52 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Afaics there is no reason why kernel threads should have FPU context
> even if use_eager_fpu() == T. Now that interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle()
> does not check __thread_has_fpu() we can remove the init_fpu() code
> from eager_fpu_init() and change flush_thread() called by do_execve()
> to initialize FPU.
>
> Note: of course, the change in flush_thread() is horrible and must be
> cleanuped. We need the new helper, and flush_thread() should return the
> error if init_fpu() fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Nice. This should help prevent us from loading and saving
the totally unused FPU state for things like idle threads
and other kernel threads.

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/