Re: About 2 ACPICA table patches

[Octavian Purdila]

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 05:02:31 PM Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi, Octavian
> > >
> >
> > Hi Lv,
> >
> > > I noticed there are 2 patches you've sent to the community.
> > > But unfortunately I didn't find them in my mailbox.
> > > Let me comment you here.
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5501621/
> > > This patch seem to be correct.
> > > But Rafael should merge it directly via Linux because acpi_unload_table_id() is not in the ACPICA upstream.
> >
> > OK, thanks for letting me know. Rafel, does the patch look ok to you?
>
> I'm Rafael, but that's OK.
>

Oops, sorry about that, typo :(

What about patch 3 of the original set [1], does it look better now?

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/16/290
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/