Re: [PATCH] of: Custom printk format specifier for device node

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +       Examples:
>> +
>> +       %pO     /foo/bar@0              - Node full name
>> +       %pO0    /foo/bar@0              - Same as above
>> +       %pO1    /foo/bar@0[10]          - Node full name + phandle
>> +       %pO2    /foo/bar@0[10:DdPB]     - Node full name + phandle + node flags
>> +                                        D - dynamic
>> +                                        d - detached
>> +                                        P - Populated
>> +                                        B - Populated bus
>
> We should think about what else we want to print for a node. Perhaps
> 'On' for name, 'Oc' for compatible, etc.

I was just going to say "The least verbose variant is name, not full_name".

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/