[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 4/7] rcu: Refine diagnostics for lacking kthread for no-CBs callbacks

[Paul E. McKenney]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Some diagnostics under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU in rcu_nocb_cpu_needs_barrier()
assume that there can be no early-boot callbacks.  This commit therefore
qualifies the diagnostic with rcu_scheduler_fully_active to permit
early boot callbacks to avoid this splat.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 371c5538c789..9b7f8c8ca355 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1938,7 +1938,8 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_cpu_needs_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp, int cpu)
 		rhp = ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->nocb_follower_head);
 
 	/* Having no rcuo kthread but CBs after scheduler starts is bad! */
-	if (!ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->nocb_kthread) && rhp) {
+	if (!ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->nocb_kthread) && rhp &&
+	    rcu_scheduler_fully_active) {
 		/* RCU callback enqueued before CPU first came online??? */
 		pr_err("RCU: Never-onlined no-CBs CPU %d has CB %p\n",
 		       cpu, rhp->func);
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/