Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] x86, entry: some cleanup and simplification...

[Alexander van Heukelum]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015, at 14:26, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Alexander van Heukelum
> <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015, at 13:05, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> btw, you might wanna sync with Denys who's doing cleanups in that area too:
> >>
> >> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421272101-16847-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> and touching some of the stuff you're changing too.
> >
> > Thanks. FWIW, the change touches the same area in code, but is orthogonal in concept.
> 
> My patches eventually eliminate both ARGOFFSET and KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET.
> For example, eventually TI_flags tests look like this after all my patches:
> 
> testl $const, TI_flags+THREAD_INFO(%rsp,SIZEOF_PTREGS)
> 
> Your patches massage the same defines in a different way than mine do.
> We clearly have a conflict here.

Indeed. I missed that, because Borislav's link only pointed to a single
change and I failed to notice the "[01/11]" in the title.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/