Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs

[Guenter Roeck]

On 01/21/2015 09:38 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:16:23AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 04:54:07 PM Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > > 2015-01-21, 16:39:12 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > That doesn't seem to help, at least in my case.
> > >
> > > Same here.
> >
> > Okay, thanks for trying.  Sorry that didn't resolve things.
> >
> > > Well, it's probably not an audit issue.  I tried audit=0 on the
> > > commandline, and I just rebuilt a kernel with CONFIG_AUDIT=n, and it's
> > > still panicing.  This should have fixed any audit-related issue,
> > > right?
> >
> > Most likely.  Back to the code I go ...
>
> FWIW, I really wonder if populate_rootfs() (run ultimately from
> kernel_init(), by way of kernel_init_freeable(), do_basic_setup() and
> do_initcalls()) ends up with some side effects as far as struct filename
> are concerned...
>
> Note that if we _ever_ hit reuse logics there, we are going to get bogus
> matches asoddingplenty - *all* those sys_mkdir(), etc. are going to be
> with filenames in the same reused buffer.  So if anything in there leaks
> from one call to another, we are going to have a mess on hands.
>
> Another place where that can be a problem is devtmpfs - there's a kernel
> thread doing actual mkdir, mknod, etc. in that abomination and if _that_
> ends up accumulating aushit entries, we'll end up with interesting problems.
>
> Folks, could you print the value of audit_dummy_context() in populate_rootfs()
> and in drivers/base/devtmpfs.c:devtmpfsd()?
populate_rootfs: audit_dummy_context() returns 1

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/