Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs

[Al Viro]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:03:20PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> ok case (putname commented out):
> 
> user_path_at_empty lookup usr flags 0x0
> path_lookupat: calling path_init 'usr' flags=40
> path_init: link_path_walk() returned 0
> path_lookupat: path_init 'usr' flags=40[50] returned 0
> walk_component: lookup_fast() returned 1
> walk_component: lookup_slow() returned 0
> walk_component: inode=  (null), negative=1
> do_path_lookup(usr, 0x10)
> path_lookupat: calling path_init 'usr' flags=50
> path_init: link_path_walk() returned 0
> path_lookupat: path_init 'usr' flags=50[50] returned 0
> mkdir[c74012a0,/usr] => 0
> user_path_at_empty lookup usr flags 0x1
> path_lookupat: calling path_init 'usr' flags=41
> path_init: link_path_walk() returned 0
> path_lookupat: path_init 'usr' flags=41[51] returned 0
> walk_component: inode=c74004a0, negative=0
> user_path_at_empty lookup usr flags 0x1
> path_lookupat: calling path_init 'usr' flags=41
> path_init: link_path_walk() returned 0
> path_lookupat: path_init 'usr' flags=41[51] returned 0
> 
> failing case:
> 
> path_lookupat: calling path_init 'usr' flags=40
> path_init: link_path_walk() returned 0
> path_lookupat: path_init 'usr' flags=40[50] returned 0
> walk_component: lookup_fast() returned 1
> walk_component: lookup_slow() returned 0
> walk_component: inode=  (null), negative=1
> do_path_lookup(usr, 0x10)
> path_lookupat: calling path_init 'usr' flags=50
> path_init: link_path_walk() returned 0
> path_lookupat: path_init 'usr' flags=50[50] returned 0
> mkdir[c74012a0,/kkk] => 0						<==== SIC!

Cute. 'k' being 0x6b, aka POISON_FREE...  OK, the next question is what's
been freed under us - I don't believe that it's dentry itself...
Oh, fuck.  OK, I see what happens.  Look at kern_path_create(); it does
LOOKUP_PARENT walk, leaving nd->last pointing to the last component of
the *COPY* of the name it's just created, walked and freed.

OK...  Fortunately, struct nameidata is completely opaque outside of fs/namei.c,
so we only need to care about a couple of codepaths.

Folks, could you check if the following on top of linux-next fixes the problem?

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 323957f..cda89c3 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -2056,13 +2056,22 @@ static int do_path_lookup(int dfd, const char *name,
 /* does lookup, returns the object with parent locked */
 struct dentry *kern_path_locked(const char *name, struct path *path)
 {
+	struct filename *filename = getname_kernel(name);
 	struct nameidata nd;
 	struct dentry *d;
-	int err = do_path_lookup(AT_FDCWD, name, LOOKUP_PARENT, &nd);
-	if (err)
+	int err;
+
+	if (IS_ERR(filename))
+		return ERR_CAST(filename);
+
+	err = filename_lookup(AT_FDCWD, filename, LOOKUP_PARENT, &nd);
+	if (err) {
+		putname(filename);
 		return ERR_PTR(err);
+	}
 	if (nd.last_type != LAST_NORM) {
 		path_put(&nd.path);
+		putname(filename);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 	mutex_lock_nested(&nd.path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
@@ -2070,9 +2079,11 @@ struct dentry *kern_path_locked(const char *name, struct path *path)
 	if (IS_ERR(d)) {
 		mutex_unlock(&nd.path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
 		path_put(&nd.path);
+		putname(filename);
 		return d;
 	}
 	*path = nd.path;
+	putname(filename);
 	return d;
 }
 
@@ -3314,7 +3325,7 @@ struct file *do_file_open_root(struct dentry *dentry, struct vfsmount *mnt,
 	return file;
 }
 
-struct dentry *kern_path_create(int dfd, const char *pathname,
+static struct dentry *filename_create(int dfd, struct filename *name,
 				struct path *path, unsigned int lookup_flags)
 {
 	struct dentry *dentry = ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
@@ -3329,7 +3340,7 @@ struct dentry *kern_path_create(int dfd, const char *pathname,
 	 */
 	lookup_flags &= LOOKUP_REVAL;
 
-	error = do_path_lookup(dfd, pathname, LOOKUP_PARENT|lookup_flags, &nd);
+	error = filename_lookup(dfd, name, LOOKUP_PARENT|lookup_flags, &nd);
 	if (error)
 		return ERR_PTR(error);
 
@@ -3383,6 +3394,19 @@ out:
 	path_put(&nd.path);
 	return dentry;
 }
+
+struct dentry *kern_path_create(int dfd, const char *pathname,
+				struct path *path, unsigned int lookup_flags)
+{
+	struct filename *filename = getname_kernel(pathname);
+	struct dentry *res = ERR_CAST(filename);
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(filename)) {
+		res = filename_create(dfd, filename, path, lookup_flags);
+		putname(filename);
+	}
+	return res;
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kern_path_create);
 
 void done_path_create(struct path *path, struct dentry *dentry)
@@ -3401,7 +3425,7 @@ struct dentry *user_path_create(int dfd, const char __user *pathname,
 	struct dentry *res;
 	if (IS_ERR(tmp))
 		return ERR_CAST(tmp);
-	res = kern_path_create(dfd, tmp->name, path, lookup_flags);
+	res = filename_create(dfd, tmp, path, lookup_flags);
 	putname(tmp);
 	return res;
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/