Re: [PATCH 0/9] watchdog: internally split softlockup and hardlockup

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:15:52 -0500 Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:20:15AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> > The hardlockup and softockup had always been tied together.  Due to the request
> > of KVM folks, they had a need to have one enabled but not the other.
> > Internally rework the code to split things apart more cleanly.
> > 
> > There is a bunch of churn here, but the end result should be code that should
> > be easier to maintain and fix without knowing the internals of what is going
> > on.
> > 
> > Tested by Uli and myself.
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Poking again.  What can I do to move this along?  Should I repost?

I don't actually remember seeing this, but November was soooo long ago ;)

Yes please - refresh, retest, resend.  Don't forget to gather up any
new acked/reviewed/tested-by's.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/