Re: [PATCH] nios2: __kuser_sigtramp placement fix
From: Ley Foon Tan
Date: Thu Jan 22 2015 - 03:43:31 EST
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2015/1/22 03:54 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Chung-Lin Tang <chunglin.tang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The address of __kuser_sigtramp is wrong by one word, due to padding
>>> __kuser_cmpxchg to fully 64 bytes. The version word at the start of the
>>> page displaces __kuser_sigtramp to 0x1044, instead of the intended 0x1040.
>>>
>>> Fixed by counting the 64-byte frame from the start of the page instead
>>> of __kuser_cmpxchg. This shortens the __kuser_cmpxchg frame to 60-bytes,
>>> but that's likely enough.
>>>
>>> The zero-byte padding parts of the kuser_pad macro has been removed, due
>>> to the .if command refusing to behave properly when there are other
>>> .word directives in between. Probably a binutils gas bug.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chung-Lin
>>>
>>> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S b/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S
>>> index 0bdfd13..3224839 100644
>>> --- a/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S
>>> +++ b/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S
>>> @@ -492,14 +492,7 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread)
>>>
>>> /* Filling pads with undefined instructions. */
>>> .macro kuser_pad sym size
>>> - .if ((. - \sym) & 3)
>>> - .rept (4 - (. - \sym) & 3)
>>> - .byte 0
>>> - .endr
>>> - .endif
>>> - .rept ((\size - (. - \sym)) / 4)
>>> - .word 0xdeadbeef
>>> - .endr
>>> + .fill ((\size - (. - \sym)) / 4), 4, 0xdeadbeef
>>> .endm
>>>
>>> .align 6
>>> @@ -526,7 +519,10 @@ cmpxchg_stw:
>>> cmpxchg_ret:
>>> ret
>>>
>>> - kuser_pad __kuser_cmpxchg, 64
>>> + /* The first 64-byte frame contains the version word, so note
>>> + that the first padding entry is based from the start of the kuser
>>> + page, instead of __kuser_cmpxchg. */
>>> + kuser_pad __kuser_helper_start, 64
>>>
>>> .globl __kuser_sigtramp
>>> __kuser_sigtramp:
>>> --
>> Hi Chung-Lin
>>
>> I thought this is our original intention for it.
>>
>> First 4 bytes is the __kuser_version and each __kuser function will
>> have 64 bytes size.
>>
>> 0x1000 __kuser_helper_version
>> 0x1004 __kuser_cmpxchg
>> 0x1044 __kuser_sigtramp
>>
>> Any reason you can't use __kuser_sigtramp @ 0x1044?
>
> Well, that's okay as well, as the main place which sets this is the
> signal frame construction in arch/nios2/kernel/signal.c. The user space
> is mostly oblivious to the exact location. You'll need to update it
> that way if you prefer 0x1044, as it's currently set at 0x1040.
>
> I suggested 0x1040 because 64b frames aligned at 64b seemed more
> intuitive; __kuser_cmpxchg would be a special case.
I think I will change to 0x1044 in arch/nios2/kernel/signal.c. I can
submit the fix.
Do you need to update toolchain for this change?
Regards
Ley Foon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/