Re: KVM: HAVE_KVM_ARCH_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 22/01/2015 15:49, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> > Ah, there are two Kconfig symbols added by mistake.
>> > 
>> > +config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT
>> > + bool
>> > +
>> > +config KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>> > + bool
> This one is actually used (so my 800 line perl monster didn't bark):
>     $ git grep -n KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT next-20150122
>     next-20150122:arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig:27:  select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>     next-20150122:arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig:30:        select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>     next-20150122:arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig:42:  select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>     next-20150122:virt/kvm/Kconfig:47:config KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>     next-20150122:virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:998:#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
> 

Yes, the mistake is adding two symbols instead of one. :)

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/