Re: [PATCH] of: Empty node & property flag accessors when !OF

[Rob Herring]

+Wolfram

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
<pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Introduce empty node and property flag accessors when CONFIG_OF is not
> defined.
> This allows us to use them without ifdef'ing them in places where it
> makes sense to do so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>

I've asked Wolfram to apply. While not a fix itself, this is needed
for an I2C related fix for 3.19.

Rob

> ---
>  include/linux/of.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index dfde07e..7ede449 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -616,6 +616,38 @@ static inline const char *of_prop_next_string(struct property *prop,
>         return NULL;
>  }
>
> +static inline int of_node_check_flag(struct device_node *n, unsigned long flag)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int of_node_test_and_set_flag(struct device_node *n,
> +                                           unsigned long flag)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void of_node_set_flag(struct device_node *n, unsigned long flag)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void of_node_clear_flag(struct device_node *n, unsigned long flag)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline int of_property_check_flag(struct property *p, unsigned long flag)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void of_property_set_flag(struct property *p, unsigned long flag)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void of_property_clear_flag(struct property *p, unsigned long flag)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  #define of_match_ptr(_ptr)     NULL
>  #define of_match_node(_matches, _node) NULL
>  #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> --
> 1.7.12
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/