Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] tty/serial: Add Spreadtrum sc9836-uart driver support

[Peter Hurley]

On 01/23/2015 02:23 AM, Lyra Zhang wrote:
> Hi, Peter
> 
> Many thanks to you for reviewing so carefully and giving us so many
> suggestions and so clear explanations.

:)

> I'll address all of your comments and send an updated patch soon.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

>>> +static void sprd_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
>>> +                                 struct ktermios *termios,
>>> +                                 struct ktermios *old)
>>> +{
>>> +     unsigned int baud, quot;
>>> +     unsigned int lcr, fc;
>>> +     unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> +     /* ask the core to calculate the divisor for us */
>>> +     baud = uart_get_baud_rate(port, termios, old, 1200, 3000000);
>>                                                       ^^^^   ^^^^^^
>>                                            mabye derive these from uartclk?
> 
> I'm afraid I can't understand very clearly, Could you explain more
> details please?

Is the fixed clock divider == 8 and the uartclk == 26000000 ?
If so,
	baud = uartclk / 8 = 3250000

I see now this is clamping baud inside the maximum, so this is fine.
Please disregard my comment.

[...]


>>> +static int sprd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct resource *res;
>>> +     struct uart_port *up;
>>> +     struct clk *clk;
>>> +     int irq;
>>> +     int index;
>>> +     int ret;
>>> +
>>> +     for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(sprd_port); index++)
>>> +             if (sprd_port[index] == NULL)
>>> +                     break;
>>> +
>>> +     if (index == ARRAY_SIZE(sprd_port))
>>> +             return -EBUSY;
>>> +
>>> +     index = sprd_probe_dt_alias(index, &pdev->dev);
>>> +
>>> +     sprd_port[index] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>>> +             sizeof(*sprd_port[index]), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +     if (!sprd_port[index])
>>> +             return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +     up = &sprd_port[index]->port;
>>> +     up->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> +     up->line = index;
>>> +     up->type = PORT_SPRD;
>>> +     up->iotype = SERIAL_IO_PORT;
>>> +     up->uartclk = SPRD_DEF_RATE;
>>> +     up->fifosize = SPRD_FIFO_SIZE;
>>> +     up->ops = &serial_sprd_ops;
>>> +     up->flags = ASYNC_BOOT_AUTOCONF;
>>                     ^^^^^^^^^
>>                     UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF
>>
>> sparse will catch errors like this. See Documentation/sparse.txt
> 
> you mean we should use UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF, right?

Yes. Only UPF_* flag definitions should be used with the uart_port.flags
field.

My comment regarding the sparse tool and documentation is because the
flags field and UPF_* definitions use a type mechanism to generate
warnings using the sparse tool if regular integer values are used
with the flags field.

The type mechanism was specifically introduced to catch using ASYNC_*
definitions with the uart_port.flags field.

[...]

>>> +static int sprd_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +     int id = to_platform_device(dev)->id;
>>> +     struct uart_port *port = &sprd_port[id]->port;
>>
>> I'm a little confused regarding the port indexing;
>> is platform_device->id == line ?  Where did that happen?
>>
> 
> Oh, I'll change to assign platform_device->id with port->line in probe()

I apologize; I should have made my comment clearer.

The ->id should not be assigned.

Replace

	int id = to_platform_device(dev)->id;
	struct uart_port *port = &sprd_port[id]->port;

	uart_suspend_port(&sprd_uart_driver, port);

with

	struct sprd_uart_port *sup = dev_get_drvdata(dev);

	uart_suspend_port(&sprd_uart_driver, &sup->port);


I know it's not obvious but platform_get/set_drvdata() is really
dev_get/set_drvdata() using the embedded struct device dev.

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +     uart_suspend_port(&sprd_uart_driver, port);
>>> +
>>> +     return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int sprd_resume(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +     int id = to_platform_device(dev)->id;
>>> +     struct uart_port *port = &sprd_port[id]->port;
>>> +
>>> +     uart_resume_port(&sprd_uart_driver, port);

same here

>>> +     return 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/