Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Overhaul the audit filename handling
From: Paul Moore
Date: Fri Jan 23 2015 - 11:16:05 EST
On Friday, January 23, 2015 05:30:56 AM Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:40:01PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:29:03PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:25:13PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > Your experimental branch looks good to me, thanks.
> > >
> > > Pushed into for-next; I'm probably going to move that stuff into a
> > > never-rebased branch, merged into for-next and safe to pull into your
> > > tree if you want to do something on top of that set.
> >
> > OK, vfs.git#getname is it; it's in never-to-be-rebased mode and it's
> > merged
> > into vfs.git#for-next (as of right now; HEAD is 9ee4c4). If you need to
> > do
> > something on top of that stuff, pulling vfs.git#getname is safe.
>
> Unfortunately, that thing was -rc2-based, leading to conflict with mainline
> in kernel/auditsc.c. My fault, I hadn't realized that "audit: create
> private file name copies when auditing inodes" in audit tree was, in fact,
> present in mainline. vfs.git#getname2 is -rc3-based, same resulting
> kernel/auditsc.c as in #getname. Please, use that. vfs.git#for-next
> merges from that one now, so tomorrow -next should have no problems from
> vfs.git...
No worries, thanks for the update.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/