Re: [PATCH 1/1] NVMe: Do not take nsid while a passthrough IO command is being issued via a block device file descriptor

[Keith Busch]

On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:22:02PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The namespace id should be enforced on block devices, but is there a
> > problem allowing arbitrary commands through the management char device?
> > I have a need for a pure passthrough, but the proposed patch requires
> > a matching namespace id all the time.
> >
> > I wrote and tested the one below to override nsid on block devices,
> > but doesn't require a visible namespace through the management device.
>
> Allowing requests to differetn namespaces through the admin interface
> doesn't sound too horrible in general, but I still don't like your patch
> below.  Instead of allocating another queue that allows arbitrary nsids
> we should simply look up the namespace when sent through the admin device,
> and still reject it if the namespace isn't valid.  If a namespaces
> is marked hidden we should still create a device for it in Linux,
> as that whole concept of hiding a namespace is silly.

No argument against removing the hidden attribute handling, but there
are unadvertised NSID's that have special meaning. Like NSID 0xffffffff
means to apply a command to all namespaces. Vendor specific commands
may have other special NSID meanings as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/