Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] perf: Sample additional clock value

[David Ahern]

On 1/23/15 10:06 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> As far as I understand (John?) POSIX timers can be used on any clockid?
> So it would be possible to obtain a dynamic clock id, for example for my
> exotic trace hardware (by any means necessary, like opening a char
> device) and create a timer firing every 1 ms (in the trace time domain).
> Than this event would be somehow associated with a perf session (for
> example, by passing the timerid via perf's ioctl) and then, every when
> timer fires, a perf record (something like PERF_RECORD_TIMER?)
> containing the timer/clock's value*and*  the normal perf timestamp,
> would be injected into the circular buffer.

Like this: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/27/158 ? note the date -- 4 
years ago. This is has been dragging on for a long time.

A few problems with that approach:
1. I would like to see a sample generated immediately to get the 
perf_clock -> timeofday correlation immediately rather than have to wait 
N (milli)seconds and have perf scan forward through an M-(giga)byte file 
looking for the one sample that gives the correlation.

I tried to address that problem with an ioctl to force a sample into the 
stream:
   https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/27/159
it did not go over very well.

2. there is a risk that the realtime samples dominate a stream.

Another issue that has been raised is updates to xtime by ntp / user. I 
have suggested tracepoints to catch those:
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/7/636
I don't believe there were ever any comments on the tracepoints.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/