Re: [PATCH] ethernet: fm10k: Actually drop 4 bits

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On Sat, Jan 24 2015, "Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Good catch! I noticed this too and was getting a patch together to address
> this.
>
> The difference is that I was planning on not silently accepting an invalid
> VLAN ID to begin with and returning FM10K_ERR_PARAM if the VLAN was
> invalid, which I think is a better approach for this situation. If it's
> alright with you, I'll generate the patch shortly and credit you via your
> Reported-by.

Sure, do what you think is best.

Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/