On 23/01/15 02:07, Stathis Voukelatos wrote:
This patch adds support the Ethernet Packet Sniffer H/W moduleIs there any latency penalty involved in capturing (or not) packets as
developed by Linn Products Ltd and found in the IMG Pistachio SoC.
The module allows Ethernet packets to be parsed, matched against
a user-defined pattern and timestamped. It sits between a 100M
Ethernet MAC and PHY and is completely passive with respect to
Ethernet frames.
opposed to having this capture HW unused?
Thanks, I will work on that change. It has been suggested by a previousMatched packet bytes and timestamp values are returned through aInstead of having this new generic netlink family to control sniffing,
FIFO. Timestamps are provided to the module through an externally
generated Gray-encoded counter.
The command pattern for packet matching is stored in module RAM
and consists of a sequence of 16-bit entries. Each entry includes
an 8-bit command code and and 8-bit data value. Valid command
codes are:
0 - Don't care
1 - Match: packet data must match command string byte
2 - Copy: packet data will be copied to FIFO
3 - Match/Stamp: if packet data matches string byte, a timestamp
is copied into the FIFO
4 - Copy/Done: packet data will be copied into the FIFO.
This command terminates the command string.
The driver consists of two modules:
- Core: it provides an API to user space using the Generic Netlink
framework. Specific backend implementations, like the
Ethernet Packet Sniffer, register one or more channels
with the Core. For each channel a Genl family is created.
User space can access a channel by sending Genl messages
to the Genl family associated with the channel. Packet
matching events are multicast.
could we imagine registering a netdevice which does not nothing but
still allows for tools like tcpdump, af_packet and other capture tools
to work transparently and just leverage the HW capture?