Re: [PATCH 6/9] clocksource: Driver for Conexant Digicolor SoC timer

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 01/29/2015 02:37 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 14:08 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > From: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add clocksource driver to the Conexant CX92755 SoC, part of the Digicolor SoCs
> > series. Hardware provides 8 timers, A to H. Timer A is dedicated to a future
> > watchdog driver so we don't use it here. Use timer B for sched_clock, and timer
> > C for clock_event.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/clocksource/Kconfig           |   3 +
> >   drivers/clocksource/Makefile          |   1 +
> >   drivers/clocksource/timer-digicolor.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   3 files changed, 203 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/clocksource/timer-digicolor.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > index a89120b..72a3827 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ config CLKBLD_I8253
> >   config CLKSRC_MMIO
> >   	bool
> >
> > +config DIGICOLOR_TIMER
> > +	bool
> > +
>
> And the select for this symbol (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/360)
> will be provided in a separate patch? Because this patch, by itself,
> won't allow DIGICOLOR_TIMER to be set, will it?

You are right, that should be done in a separate patch. I believe Baruch 
should have done that.

--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/