Re: [PATCH v5] perf: Use monotonic clock as a source for timestamps

[Pawel Moll]

Afternoon, Peter,

On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 20:27 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> Until now, perf framework never defined the meaning of the timestamps
> captured as PERF_SAMPLE_TIME sample type. The values were obtaining
> from local (sched) clock, which is unavailable in userspace. This made
> it impossible to correlate perf data with any other events. Other
> tracing solutions have the source configurable (ftrace) or just share
> a common time domain between kernel and userspace (LTTng).
> 
> Follow the trend by using monotonic clock, which is readily available
> as POSIX CLOCK_MONOTONIC.
> 
> Also add a sysctl "perf_sample_time_clk_id" attribute (usually available
> as "/proc/sys/kernel/perf_sample_time_clk_id") which can be used by the
> user to obtain the clk_id to be used with POSIX clock API (eg.
> clock_gettime()) to obtain a time value comparable with perf samples.
> 
> Old behaviour can be restored by using "perf_use_local_clock" kernel
> parameter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>

I know that you're busy with other stuff, but it's already rc7 time
again... We can leave the other two patches from the series for later,
but how about getting this one merged for 3.20 and ending the 2 or 3
years long struggle? I'm not saying that everyone is happy about it, but
no one seems to be unhappy enough to speak :-)

Cheers!

Pawel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/