Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/exec: Check if the syscall exists and bail if not

[Michael Ellerman]

On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 08:32 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/03/2015 12:58 AM, David Drysdale wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On systems which don't implement sys_execveat(), this test produces a
> >> lot of output.
> >>
> >> Add a check at the beginning to see if the syscall is present, and if
> >> not just note one error and return.
> >>
> >> When we run on a system that doesn't implement the syscall we will get
> >> ENOSYS back from the kernel, so change the logic that handles
> >> __NR_execveat not being defined to also use ENOSYS rather than -ENOSYS.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Acked-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks Michael, and David. I will queue this for 3.20

Thanks.

cheers


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/