Re: watchdog: SOC_MT7621?

[Guenter Roeck]

On 02/04/2015 04:22 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> John Crispin schreef op wo 04-02-2015 om 12:10 [+0100]:
> > i think wim should just drop it and we leave it in openwrt with the
> > other 1/2 million patches that we have. i prefer to upstream the stuff
> > without feeling pressured to hurry up, that kills the fun.
>
> Once code is mainlined you'll get fixes written for you, updates done
> for you, etc. But you'll also get pointed at defects that require you to
> fix them yourself, or see the code removed eventually.
>
> > @Wim, can you drop the patch please ?
>
> Why should Wim drop more than the
>      || SOC_MT7621
>
> snippet?

Question is if the driver works with MT7620 as advertised. Either case
it would be odd if the driver advertises itself as MT7621 but only works
for MT7620, so I think it should be dropped entirely for now.

Wim, should I possibly ask Stephen to include my watchdog-next branch
in his -next builds ? This would help us catching such problems earlier.

Thanks,
Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/