Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: Fix build breakage on !SMP

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Thu Feb 05 2015 - 07:32:42 EST

Next message: Lad Prabhakar: "[PATCH] scsi: qla1280: fix sparse warnings"
Previous message: Dan Carpenter: "Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8192u: r8192U_core: Fix for possible null pointer dereference"
In reply to: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: Fix build breakage on !SMP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Thursday, February 05, 2015 08:12:20 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Åro, 2015-02-04 at 19:07 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 11:27:26 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > The Exynos cpuidle driver has coupled cpuidle built-in so it cannot be
> > > built without SMP:
> > >
> > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c: In function âexynos_cpu0_enter_aftrâ:
> > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:246:4: error: implicit declaration of function âarch_send_wakeup_ipi_maskâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `exynos_pre_enter_aftr':
> > > ../arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:300: undefined reference to `cpu_boot_reg_base'
> > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `exynos_cpu1_powerdown':
> > > ../arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:282: undefined reference to `exynos_cpu_power_down'
> > >
> > > Make the cpuidle driver depending on SMP because this will be the
> > > fastest way to fix build break without adding a bunch of ifdefs in few
> > > places.
> >
> > There shouldn't be a lot of new ifdefs (please see below) and I would
> > very much prefer for cpuidle to stay supported also on UP kernels.
>
> Sure, I'm fine with your patch.

Thanks!

I tested it today with SMP & UP kernels on Origen4210 board and it works
fine in both cases (-next is fine on Origen4210, the problem I hit yestereday
was caused by a configuration issue on my side).

Kukjin, please apply it. Thank you.

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 2 ++
> > > drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 3 ++-
> > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> > > index e6209dadc00d..17db00ff7f3a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> > > @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ void exynos_enter_aftr(void)
> > > cpu_pm_exit();
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE
> > > static atomic_t cpu1_wakeup = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > >
> > > static int exynos_cpu0_enter_aftr(void)
> > > @@ -302,3 +303,4 @@ struct cpuidle_exynos_data cpuidle_coupled_exynos_data = {
> > > .pre_enter_aftr = exynos_pre_enter_aftr,
> > > .post_enter_aftr = exynos_post_enter_aftr,
> > > };
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm
> > > index 8e07c9419153..5eb86a4f74d9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm
> > > @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ config ARM_AT91_CPUIDLE
> > > config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE
> > > bool "Cpu Idle Driver for the Exynos processors"
> > > depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> > > - select ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED if SMP
> > > + depends on SMP
> > > + select ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED
> > > help
> > > Select this to enable cpuidle for Exynos processors
> >
> > How's about the patch below instead? It builds fine for UP and SMP.
> > I will do more testing tomorrow (unfortunately it seems that something
> > else broke Origen4210 in -next).
> >
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: Fix build breakage on !SMP
> >
> > The Exynos cpuidle driver has coupled cpuidle built-in so it cannot be
> > built without SMP:
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c: In function âexynos_cpu0_enter_aftrâ:
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:246:4: error: implicit declaration of function âarch_send_wakeup_ipi_maskâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `exynos_pre_enter_aftr':
> > ../arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:300: undefined reference to `cpu_boot_reg_base'
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `exynos_cpu1_powerdown':
> > ../arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:282: undefined reference to `exynos_cpu_power_down'
> >
> > Fix it by adding missing checks for SMP.
> >
> > Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c | 3 ++-
> > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c 2015-02-04 18:30:23.555819717 +0100
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c 2015-02-04 18:43:23.539807815 +0100
> > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void __init exynos_dt_machine_ini
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
> > exynos_sysram_init();
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE)
> > if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210"))
> > exynos_cpuidle.dev.platform_data = &cpuidle_coupled_exynos_data;
> > #endif
> > Index: b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c 2015-02-04 18:30:23.563819719 +0100
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c 2015-02-04 18:47:32.951804008 +0100
> > @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ void exynos_enter_aftr(void)
> > cpu_pm_exit();
> > }
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE)
> > static atomic_t cpu1_wakeup = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> >
> > static int exynos_cpu0_enter_aftr(void)
> > @@ -302,3 +303,4 @@ struct cpuidle_exynos_data cpuidle_coupl
> > .pre_enter_aftr = exynos_pre_enter_aftr,
> > .post_enter_aftr = exynos_post_enter_aftr,
> > };
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE */
> > Index: b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c 2015-02-04 18:30:32.935819577 +0100
> > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c 2015-02-04 18:46:01.619805400 +0100
> > @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ static int exynos_cpuidle_probe(struct p
> > {
> > int ret;
> >
> > - if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210")) {
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) &&
> > + of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210")) {
> > exynos_cpuidle_pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> >
> > ret = cpuidle_register(&exynos_coupled_idle_driver,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Lad Prabhakar: "[PATCH] scsi: qla1280: fix sparse warnings"
Previous message: Dan Carpenter: "Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8192u: r8192U_core: Fix for possible null pointer dereference"
In reply to: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: cpuidle: Fix build breakage on !SMP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]