Re: [PATCH] xen/acpi-processor: fix sparse warning

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:39:21AM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> this patch fixes following sparse warning:
> 
> xen-acpi-processor.c:505:23: warning: symbol 'xen_acpi_processor_resume_nb' was not declared. Should it be static?

Not sure if it is worth fixing it - as that whole code is only
executed under normal PV guests - where it does not make
sense for it be executed.

That whole xen_resume_notifier should go away.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Found this issue on linux-next (gcc  version 4.9.2,
>  sparse version  0.4.5-rc1)and applies on top linux-next.
> 
>  drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c b/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
> index 59fc190..6c1f921 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int xen_acpi_processor_resume(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  	return xen_upload_processor_pm_data();
>  }
>  
> -struct notifier_block xen_acpi_processor_resume_nb = {
> +static struct notifier_block xen_acpi_processor_resume_nb = {
>  	.notifier_call = xen_acpi_processor_resume,
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/