Re: use of opaque subject lines

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 08:32:13PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:57 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > And _NEVER_ have automated scripts create patches and send them out.  I
> > only know of ONE person/bot that gets away with this, and you are not
> > that person, sorry.  It it not a script on the receiving end of your
> > output, so don't use a script to create a mess for them to dig through.
> 
> Mind if I ask which person/bot you have in mind?

If you don't know that there is a bot doing patches, then that proves it
is so good that people do not realize it :)

> People are trying to
> bot away the kconfig related messages I send out - which I think is a
> very good idea - and I'd like to know what level that bot should reach
> before people can get out of its way.
> 
> (I happen to think that the stuff I currently do is best done with a
> human filter applied.)

Please stick with a human filter, that's the best thing possible.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/