Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:07:56 +0100
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Your patchset fixes the issue for me (look at the attached files for
> more detailed information).

So I can add your Tested-by tag?

> 
> I tested the "To Be Loved" (TBL VS. TLB flushes) edition against
> Linux-next (next-20150204) where I had originally seen and reported
> the call-trace.
> 
> Before I forget... The Fixes-tag misses pointing to Dave Hansen's...
> 
> commit d17d8f9dedb9dd76fd540a5c497101529d9eb25a
> "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes"

Sure, I can add that, and even Cc stable for 3.17+.

> 
> My POV is that both patches somehow belong together.
> If you decide to push them through two different trees, please add a
> note/reference to each other.

The second patch should reference the first one.

But the first patch is a much broader change and more generic which
could affect many other locations as well. It is specific to
tracepoints, where the tlb one is specific to a single instance. As the
first patch affects all tracepoints, I want it in my tree.


-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/