Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU

[Sedat Dilek]

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:07:56 +0100
> Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Your patchset fixes the issue for me (look at the attached files for
>> more detailed information).
>
> So I can add your Tested-by tag?
>

Yes.

>>
>> I tested the "To Be Loved" (TBL VS. TLB flushes) edition against
>> Linux-next (next-20150204) where I had originally seen and reported
>> the call-trace.
>>
>> Before I forget... The Fixes-tag misses pointing to Dave Hansen's...
>>
>> commit d17d8f9dedb9dd76fd540a5c497101529d9eb25a
>> "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes"
>
> Sure, I can add that, and even Cc stable for 3.17+.
>

Excellent!

>>
>> My POV is that both patches somehow belong together.
>> If you decide to push them through two different trees, please add a
>> note/reference to each other.
>
> The second patch should reference the first one.
>
> But the first patch is a much broader change and more generic which
> could affect many other locations as well. It is specific to
> tracepoints, where the tlb one is specific to a single instance. As the
> first patch affects all tracepoints, I want it in my tree.
>

Important for me is that the reference is embedded.

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/