Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline

[Sedat Dilek]

On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:27:54 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Both patches survived all my tests, now I just need an ack by from Dave
> and/or Peter, and I'll push it off to Linus.
>

I fell over this w/o having any experiences in using the tracing
system within the Linux-kernel.
Can you give a brief introduction?
Or can describe how you made your tests?
Did you use trace-cmd in your tests?

Thanks.

- Sedat -

[1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/trace-cmd.git/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/