[PATCH] f2fs: avoid data offset overflow when lseeking huge file
From: Chao Yu
Date: Sun Feb 08 2015 - 22:25:23 EST
xfstest generic/285 complains our issue in lseeking huge file.
Here is the detail output of generic/285:
"./check -f2fs tests/generic/285
Ran: generic/285
Failures: generic/285
Failed 1 of 1 tests
10. Test a huge file for offset overflow
10.01 SEEK_HOLE expected 65536 or 8589934592, got 65536. succ
10.02 SEEK_HOLE expected 65536 or 8589934592, got 65536. succ
10.03 SEEK_DATA expected 0 or 0, got 0. succ
10.04 SEEK_DATA expected 1 or 1, got 1. succ
10.05 SEEK_HOLE expected 8589934592 or 8589934592, got 0. FAIL
10.06 SEEK_DATA expected 8589869056 or 8589869056, got 8589869056. succ
10.07 SEEK_DATA expected 8589869057 or 8589869057, got 8589869057. succ
10.08 SEEK_DATA expected 8589869056 or 8589869056, got 4294901760. FAIL"
The reason of this issue is:
We will calculate current offset through left shifting page-offset with
PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT bits, but our page-offset is a type of unsigned long, its size
is 4 bytes in 32-bits machine.
So if our page-offset is bigger than (1 << 32 / pagesize - 1), result of left
shifting will overflow.
Let's fix this issue by casting type of page-offset to type of current offset:
loff_t.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 5cbbc9a..7dc0ed8 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static loff_t f2fs_seek_block(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
/* find data/hole in dnode block */
for (; dn.ofs_in_node < end_offset;
dn.ofs_in_node++, pgofs++,
- data_ofs = pgofs << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) {
+ data_ofs = (loff_t)pgofs << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) {
block_t blkaddr;
blkaddr = datablock_addr(dn.node_page, dn.ofs_in_node);
--
2.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/