Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/4] Probe deferral for IOMMU DT integration

[Laura Abbott]

On 2/7/2015 2:41 PM, arnd@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> Laura Abbott <lauraa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> hat am 6. Februar 2015 um 01:31
> geschrieben:
> > The requirement for this is based on a previous patch to add clock
> > support to the ARM SMMU driver[2]. Once we have clock support, it's
> > possible that the driver itself may need to be defered which breaks
> > a bunch of assumptions about how SMMU probing is supposed to work.
>
> Hi Laura,
>
> I was hoping that we would not need this, and instead treat the iommu in
> the same way as timers and SMP initialization, both
> of which need to be run early at boot time but may rely on clock controllers
> to be initialized first.
>
> Is there a specific requirement that makes this impossible here, or is your
> intention to solve the problem more nicely by allowing deferred probing
> over forcing the input clocks of the iommu to be early?
>
>        Arnd

The current clock driver for qcom targets doesn't support the early
initialization needed for timers and SMP because neither of those depend
on the clocksources. I discussed this with Stephen some and adding the
early support would not mesh well with the device/driver design of the
current clock driver so that's not really an option right now.

I do think the deferred probing design is cleaner. Even cleaner would
be a proper bus type but that's a different can of worms.

Thanks,
Laura

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/