Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: cadence: fixup of wait_for_completion_timeout return handling

From: Sergei Shtylyov
Date: Tue Feb 10 2015 - 09:17:32 EST


Hello.

On 2/9/2015 6:03 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:

return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int. The
return variable is renamed to reflect its use and the type adjusted to
unsigned long.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx>
---

v2: int ret is an idiom not only a declaration - thus rather than just
changing the type, rename the variable, as suggested by Wolfram Sang
<wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>.

Patch was only compile tested with multi_v7_defconfig
(implies CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=y)

Patch is against 3.19.0-rc7 (localversion-next is -next-20150209)

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c
index 7d7a14c..8f92732f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static void cdns_i2c_master_reset(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
static int cdns_i2c_process_msg(struct cdns_i2c *id, struct i2c_msg *msg,
struct i2c_adapter *adap)
{
- int ret;
+ unsigned long timeout;
u32 reg;

id->p_msg = msg;
@@ -501,8 +501,8 @@ static int cdns_i2c_process_msg(struct cdns_i2c *id, struct i2c_msg *msg,
cdns_i2c_msend(id);

/* Wait for the signal of completion */
- ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&id->xfer_done, adap->timeout);
- if (!ret) {
+ timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&id->xfer_done, adap->timeout);
+ if (!timeout) {

Which means that timeout *did* expire, contrary to what one may think. I don't think this is a good name for the variable, I'd suggest something like 'time_left' instead...

cdns_i2c_master_reset(adap);
dev_err(id->adap.dev.parent,
"timeout waiting on completion\n");

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/