Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] proc: add /proc/<pid>/universe to show livepatch status

From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Tue Feb 10 2015 - 13:47:24 EST


On 02/09/2015, 06:31 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Expose the per-task klp_universe value so users can determine which
> tasks are holding up completion of a patching operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 3f3d7ae..b9fe6b5 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -2528,6 +2528,14 @@ static int proc_pid_personality(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> return err;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> +static int proc_pid_klp_universe(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> + struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return seq_printf(m, "%d\n", task->klp_universe);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> +
> /*
> * Thread groups
> */
> @@ -2628,6 +2636,9 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
> REG("timers", S_IRUGO, proc_timers_operations),
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> + ONE("universe", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_klp_universe),

I am not sure if this can be UGO or if it should be USR only instead.
Leaving for discussion, but I incline to use USR to avoid *any* info
leakage.

> +#endif

regards,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/