[PATCH] genirq: allow mixed IRQF_NO_SUSPEND requests
From: Mark Rutland
Date: Tue Feb 10 2015 - 15:14:33 EST
In some cases a physical IRQ line may be shared between devices from
which we expect interrupts during suspend (e.g. timers) and those we do
not (e.g. anything we cut the power to). Where a driver did not request
the interrupt with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, it's unlikely that it can handle
being called during suspend, and it may bring down the system.
This patch adds logic to automatically mark the irqactions for these
potentially unsafe handlers as disabled during suspend, leaving actions
with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND enabled. If an interrupt is raised on a shared line
during suspend, only the handlers requested with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND will be
called. The handlers requested without IRQF_NO_SUSPEND will be skipped
as if they had immediately returned IRQF_NONE.
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/interrupt.h | 4 ++++
kernel/irq/handle.c | 13 +++++++++++-
kernel/irq/pm.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index d9b05b5..49dcb35 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@
* IRQF_NO_THREAD - Interrupt cannot be threaded
* IRQF_EARLY_RESUME - Resume IRQ early during syscore instead of at device
* resume time.
+ * IRQF_NO_ACTION - This irqaction should not be triggered.
+ * Used during suspend for !IRQF_NO_SUSPEND irqactions which
+ * share lines with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND irqactions.
*/
#define IRQF_DISABLED 0x00000020
#define IRQF_SHARED 0x00000080
@@ -70,6 +73,7 @@
#define IRQF_FORCE_RESUME 0x00008000
#define IRQF_NO_THREAD 0x00010000
#define IRQF_EARLY_RESUME 0x00020000
+#define IRQF_NO_ACTION 0x00040000
#define IRQF_TIMER (__IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_NO_THREAD)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 6354802..44c8662 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -130,6 +130,17 @@ void __irq_wake_thread(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
wake_up_process(action->thread);
}
+static irqreturn_t __handle_irq_event_percpu(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *action)
+{
+ /*
+ * During suspend we must not call potentially unsafe irq handlers.
+ * See suspend_suspendable_actions.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(action->flags & IRQF_NO_ACTION))
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+ return action->handler(irq, action->dev_id);
+}
+
irqreturn_t
handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
{
@@ -140,7 +151,7 @@ handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
irqreturn_t res;
trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
- res = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id);
+ res = __handle_irq_event_percpu(irq, action);
trace_irq_handler_exit(irq, action, res);
if (WARN_ONCE(!irqs_disabled(),"irq %u handler %pF enabled interrupts\n",
diff --git a/kernel/irq/pm.c b/kernel/irq/pm.c
index 3ca5325..9d8a71f 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/pm.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c
@@ -43,9 +43,6 @@ void irq_pm_install_action(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
if (action->flags & IRQF_NO_SUSPEND)
desc->no_suspend_depth++;
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(desc->no_suspend_depth &&
- desc->no_suspend_depth != desc->nr_actions);
}
/*
@@ -63,11 +60,54 @@ void irq_pm_remove_action(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
desc->no_suspend_depth--;
}
+/*
+ * Physical IRQ lines may be shared between devices which may be expected to
+ * raise interrupts during suspend (e.g. timers) and those which may not (e.g.
+ * anything we cut the power to). If an action was requested without
+ * IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, then the handler probably can't handle being called during
+ * suspend, and may bring the system down.
+ *
+ * When going down for suspend, mark those potentially unsafe actions so they
+ * won't be called by handle_irq_event_percpu, as if we'd actually disabled the
+ * irq.
+ */
+static void suspend_suspendable_actions(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ struct irqaction *action;
+
+ if (desc->nr_actions == desc->no_suspend_depth)
+ return;
+
+ for (action = desc->action; action; action = action->next)
+ if (!(action->flags & IRQF_NO_SUSPEND))
+ action->flags |= IRQF_NO_ACTION;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Reenable irqactions which were disabled during suspend. This undoes
+ * suspend_suspendable_actions.
+ */
+static void resume_suspendable_actions(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ struct irqaction *action;
+
+ if (desc->nr_actions == desc->no_suspend_depth)
+ return;
+
+ for (action = desc->action; action; action = action->next)
+ action->flags &= ~IRQF_NO_ACTION;
+}
+
static bool suspend_device_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
{
- if (!desc->action || desc->no_suspend_depth)
+ if (!desc->action)
return false;
+ if (desc->no_suspend_depth) {
+ suspend_suspendable_actions(desc);
+ return false;
+ }
+
if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED);
/*
@@ -135,6 +175,8 @@ static void resume_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
if (desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED)
goto resume;
+ resume_suspendable_actions(desc);
+
/* Force resume the interrupt? */
if (!desc->force_resume_depth)
return;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/