Re: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: Call CLFLUSH only on X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR-affected CPUs

[Scotty Bauer]

For what its worth I tried it out and it works fine on my end.

Thanks for doing the hard work for me, Boris. Also, thanks for a pointer to the alternatives.

I think it may be worth doing a patch that is almost verbatim to this for mwait_idle_with_hints in arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h to keep things consistent. I can work on that over the weekend.

--Scotty

On 02/06/2015 09:13 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: Call CLFLUSH only on X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR-affected CPUs
>
> Make the AAI65 erratum workaround for Xeon 7400 machines only instead of
> punishing all CPUs doing idle with MWAIT with the CLFLUSH penalty.
>
> Based on a patch originally by Scotty Bauer <sbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> Cc: Scotty Bauer <sbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 6d7022c683e3..771ebd6e8b77 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1432,7 +1432,11 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
>  		 * case where we return around the loop.
>  		 */
>  		mb();
> -		clflush(mwait_ptr);
> +
> +		asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("", "clflush %[p]",
> +					 X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR)
> +				: [p] "+m" (*(unsigned long *)mwait_ptr));
> +
>  		mb();
>  		__monitor(mwait_ptr, 0, 0);
>  		mb();

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/