Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] add support for pmic_arb v2 and correct framework

[Stephen Boyd]

On 02/11, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:08:58 -0800
> Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On 02/09/15 14:51, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> > > pmic_arb v2 has no support for spmi non-data commands and thus
> > > returns -EOPNOTSUPP on .cmd callback. This causes a failure in
> > > spmi_drv_probe() which sends a wakeup command to the slave before
> > > probing its driver. This patchset removes the wakeup from
> > > spmi_drv_probe() since the spmi spec stipulates that a slaves
> > > default state is active and doesn't need a wakeup.
> > 
> > The spec also seems to stipulate that SPMI masters shall support all
> > SPMI command sequences.
> 
> Regardless of the master's support, a wakeup call before prob is not
> required.

Yes that seems to match what the spec says.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/