Re: [PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Thu Feb 12 2015 - 21:58:00 EST
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:02:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool.
>>
>> The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt
>> coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing,
>> which means we'd deprecate this in the next virtio standard.
>>
>> I think the right answer is to extend like we did with
>> vring_used_event(), eg:
>>
>> 1) Add a new feature VIRTIO_F_RING_COALESCE.
>> 2) Add another a 32-bit field after vring_used_event(), eg:
>> #define vring_used_delay(vr) (*(u32 *)((vr)->avail->ring[(vr)->num + 2]))
>>
>> This loses the ability to coalesce by number of frames, but we can still
>> do number of sg entries, as we do now with used_event, and we could
>> change virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() to take a precise number if we
>> wanted.
>
> But do we expect delay to be update dynamically?
> If not, why not stick it in config space?
Hmm, we could update it dynamically (and will, in the case of ethtool).
But it won't be common, so we could append a field to
virtio_pci_common_cfg for PCI.
I think MMIO and CCW would be easy to extend too, but CC'd to check.
>> My feeling is that this should be a v1.0-only feature though
>> (eg. feature bit 33).
>
> Yes, e.g. we can't extend config space for legacy virtio pci.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/