Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] xhci: add a quirk for device disconnection errata for Synopsis Designware USB3 core

[Mathias Nyman]

On 12.02.2015 17:18, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> 
>> On 25.01.2015 10:13, Sneeker Yeh wrote:
>>> This issue is defined by a three-way race at disconnect, between
>>> 1) Class driver interrupt endpoint resheduling attempts if the ISR gave an ep
>>>    error event due to device detach (it would try 3 times)
>>> 2) Disconnect interrupt on PORTSC_CSC, which is cleared by hub thread
>>>    asynchronously
>>> 3) The hardware IP was configured in silicon with
>>>    - DWC_USB3_SUSPEND_ON_DISCONNECT_EN=1
>>>    - Synopsys IP version is < 3.00a
>>> The IP will auto-suspend itself on device detach with some phy-specific interval
>>> after CSC is cleared by 2)
>>>
>>> If 2) and 3) complete before 1), the interrupts it expects will not be generated
>>> by the autosuspended IP, leading to a deadlock. Even later disconnection
>>> procedure would detect that corresponding urb is still in-progress and issue a
>>> ep stop command, auto-suspended IP still won't respond to that command.
> 
> If the Synopsys IP provides a way to do it, it would be better to turn
> off the autosuspend feature entirely.  Doesn't autosuspend violate the
> xHCI specification?
> 
>> So did I understand correctly that the class driver submits a new urb which
>> is enqueued by xhci_urb_enqueue() before the hub thread notices the device is disconnected.
>> Then hub thread clears CSC bit, controller suspends and the new urb is never given back?
>>
>> Doesn't the CSC bit and PORT_CONNECT bit show the device is disconnected when we enter
>> xhci_enqueue_urb(), even it the hub thread doesn't know this yet?
> 
> What if the device disconnects _after_ the new URB is enqueued?

True, those URBs would be left hanging.

So if possible, tweaking the Synopsis autosuspend feature would be nicer.

If its not possible then I guess a quirk patch like this will do.

-Mathias


 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/