Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: berlin: refactor the clock

[Andrew Lunn]

> >DT bindings of this platform as "unstable", just like the AT91 guys did
> >for their DT bindings
> >(http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README#n100) ?
> 
> Sounds like a plan.

So we all seem to agree that we should break backwards compatibility
with the current binding. And we should explicitly document that
things are currently unstable. I would also suggest putting a comment
about being unstable into the .dts files as well. The .dts files are
more visible to potential users than the binding documents.

     Andrew

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/