Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: udc-core: independent registration of gadgets and gadget drivers

[Andrzej Pietrasiewicz]

W dniu 15.02.2015 o 23:43, Ruslan Bilovol pisze:

<snip>

> > In my opinion all things which you have described are working out-of-box
> > when you use configfs interface. It's mostly ready so you may create
> > equivalent of most legacy gadgets (apart from printer and tcm) and
> > just bind from one udc to another whenever you want.
>
> It's because legacy gadgets are easy to use and usually don't need any
> userspace-side configuration. Are there any plans to remove legacy
> drivers in the future?

I'm not going to express strong opinions here, but their name implies
that this can happen, some time in the future.

And I also think it will not happen before the userspace part
(libusbg, gt, gadgetd etc) is mature enough. My personal opinion
in that matter is that it will take at least a couple of years
to remove legacy gadgets entirely.

AP

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/